get_wisembly_event

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations provided, the description carries the full burden of behavioral disclosure. It states 'Fetch event data' but doesn't describe traits like read-only vs. destructive, authentication needs, rate limits, error handling, or response format. The description adds minimal context beyond the basic action, leaving significant gaps in understanding how the tool behaves.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, efficient sentence with zero waste: 'Fetch event data from the Wisembly API for any keyword'. It is appropriately sized and front-loaded, clearly stating the core purpose without unnecessary details. Every word earns its place, making it highly concise and well-structured.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's complexity (a read operation with one parameter), lack of annotations, and no output schema, the description is incomplete. It doesn't explain what 'event data' includes, how results are returned, or any behavioral traits. For a tool fetching data from an API, more context on response format and usage constraints is needed to be fully helpful.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema has 100% description coverage, with the parameter 'keyword' documented as 'The keyword to search for in the Wisembly API'. The description adds no additional meaning beyond this, as it only repeats 'any keyword' without elaborating on format, examples, or constraints. Baseline 3 is appropriate since the schema does the heavy lifting.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action ('Fetch') and resource ('event data from the Wisembly API'), specifying it's for 'any keyword'. It distinguishes from the sibling tool 'get_wisembly_sessions' by focusing on events rather than sessions, though it doesn't explicitly mention this distinction. The purpose is specific but could be more precise about what 'event data' entails.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives, such as the sibling tool 'get_wisembly_sessions'. It mentions 'any keyword' but doesn't specify contexts, prerequisites, or exclusions. Usage is implied only through the tool name and description, lacking explicit instructions for selection.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.