Scored across 12 tools
Each tool targets a distinct operation: file creation/deletion/reading, text replacement/insertion/atomic batch edits, declaration lookup vs. general grep, and command execution vs. test running. Even closely related tools like replace_text and insert are clearly separated by their use cases and the apply tool explicitly aggregates them. No ambiguity among the 12 tools.
All tool names follow a consistent snake_case verb_pattern (delete_file, read_range, find, create_file, grep, declare_command, run_tests, apply, check, insert, replace_text, run_command). While some verbs lack explicit noun objects, the pattern is uniform and predictable across the entire set.
With 12 tools, the server is well-scoped for its purpose as a code editing and validation assistant. Each tool covers a necessary operation without redundancy, fitting comfortably within the typical 3-15 range for a focused toolset.
The tool surface covers the core lifecycle: file creation, deletion, reading, editing (replace/insert/apply), searching (grep/find), and command execution (check/run_tests/run_command/declare_command). Minor gaps exist, such as no explicit file listing or rename operation, but these are likely out of scope and do not create workflow dead ends for typical coding tasks.