get_role
Retrieve details and permissions of a specific role by providing its numeric ID.
Instructions
Get details of a specific role including its permissions
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| role_id | Yes | Role numeric ID |
Retrieve details and permissions of a specific role by providing its numeric ID.
Get details of a specific role including its permissions
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| role_id | Yes | Role numeric ID |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are provided, and the description only states the basic read operation. It does not disclose behavioral traits such as authentication requirements, rate limits, side effects, or that it is non-destructive. The word 'get' implies read-only, but this is not explicitly stated.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single concise sentence that immediately states the tool's purpose without any extraneous words or filler content.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the tool has only one parameter and no output schema, the description adequately indicates the type of information returned (details and permissions). However, it could be more complete by specifying that the response includes a full role object with its permissions.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 100%—the sole parameter role_id is described as 'Role numeric ID' in the schema. The tool description adds no additional meaning or context for this parameter beyond what the schema already provides, so baseline 3 is appropriate.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the verb 'Get' and the resource 'details of a specific role including its permissions', which distinguishes it from sibling tools like list_roles (which retrieves all roles) or create_role / delete_role that modify roles.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description implies usage for a single role by specifying 'specific role', but it does not explicitly state when to use this tool over alternatives like list_roles, nor does it provide any when-not or prerequisite guidance.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/juanleon8581/taiga-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server