get_epic
Retrieve full details of an epic by providing its numeric ID. This returns all epic information from Taiga.
Instructions
Get details of a specific epic by ID
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| epic_id | Yes | Epic numeric ID |
Retrieve full details of an epic by providing its numeric ID. This returns all epic information from Taiga.
Get details of a specific epic by ID
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| epic_id | Yes | Epic numeric ID |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided; description only says 'Get details' without clarifying read-only nature, error handling, or side effects. For a read tool, should state it's safe.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single sentence, no redundancy. Efficient but borders on under-specification. Good for simple tool.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Adequate for a one-parameter read tool, but lacks behavioral context and usage guidance that would make it fully complete for an AI agent.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100% with clear description for epic_id. Description adds no extra meaning beyond schema, so baseline score of 3 is appropriate.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Description clearly states verb 'Get', resource 'epic', and method 'by ID', which distinguishes it from list/create/update siblings.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool vs alternatives like get_issue or list_epics. Lacks context for decision-making.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/juanleon8581/taiga-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server