hcloud_list_dcs_instances
List DCS (Redis) instances in a given region, optionally limiting the number of results returned.
Instructions
List DCS (Redis) instances
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| region | Yes | Region | |
| limit | No | Max results |
List DCS (Redis) instances in a given region, optionally limiting the number of results returned.
List DCS (Redis) instances
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| region | Yes | Region | |
| limit | No | Max results |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are present, and the description fails to disclose any behavioral traits such as read-only nature, required permissions, pagination, or return structure. It simply repeats the tool's purpose.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is extremely concise but under-specified. It provides minimal information and fails to front-load important behavioral details.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the lack of output schema and annotations, the description is insufficient. It does not cover required context like regional scope or result format, leaving gaps for agent understanding.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100% with descriptions for both parameters. The description adds no extra meaning beyond what the schema provides, achieving baseline score.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Description clearly states it lists DCS instances and expands DCS to Redis, providing a specific verb-resource combination. However, it lacks differentiation from sibling tools like hcloud_list_dcs_flavors or hcloud_list_dcs_available_zones.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus siblings or alternatives. The description does not mention context or exclusions.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/juandvasquezp/hcloud-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server