get_product
Retrieve a product's details, such as name, description, and pricing, by providing its unique product ID.
Instructions
Get product details
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| id | Yes | Product ID |
Retrieve a product's details, such as name, description, and pricing, by providing its unique product ID.
Get product details
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| id | Yes | Product ID |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are provided, and the description only states 'Get product details', which implies a read operation but gives no information about return format, error handling, permissions, or side effects.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single concise sentence with no filler, effectively communicating the tool's core function.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the simple nature of the tool (one parameter, no output schema), the description is minimally sufficient but lacks details about what 'product details' includes or any related context; score of 3.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The input schema fully documents the required 'id' parameter with description 'Product ID', so the description does not need to add parameter details; baseline score of 3.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Description 'Get product details' clearly identifies a retrieval action for a product resource, distinguishing it from sibling tools like get_payment_link or create_product.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
Description provides no context on when to choose this over alternatives, such as list_products or get_customer; no prerequisites or exclusions are mentioned.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/jsyapps/stripe-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server