create_reddit_campaign

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The annotation destructiveHint: true signals that the tool has a destructive effect (spending money). The description does not add additional behavioral details (e.g., billing, approval process). Given the annotation coverage, the description adds minimal extra value.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

A single, clear sentence that efficiently conveys the tool's purpose without extraneous words. Well-structured and front-loaded.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The description is adequate for a creation tool with 5 parameters and destructive hint. However, it lacks information about expected outputs (e.g., campaign ID) and post-creation steps, which would be helpful given no output schema.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so the schema fully documents parameters. The description adds no additional parameter information beyond the schema, meeting the baseline for high coverage.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description clearly states 'Create a Reddit Ads campaign for community-based advertising', specifying the action (create), resource (Reddit Ads campaign), and context (community-based). The name and sibling tools differentiate it from other platform-specific campaign creation tools.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies use for Reddit Ads campaigns, and sibling tool names (e.g., create_linkedin_campaign) provide implicit differentiation. However, no explicit when-to-use or when-not-to-use guidance is given.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.