Skip to main content
Glama

batch_add_items

Add multiple tasks or projects to OmniFocus in one operation, reducing repetitive data entry.

Instructions

Add multiple tasks or projects to OmniFocus in a single operation

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
itemsYesArray of items (tasks or projects) to add

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections. Dates show when Glama detected each change.

  1. Changed4 schema fields changedv1.18.0
    • changedInput schema / properties / items / items / properties / parentTaskId / description
      Previous value: -"For tasks: The ID of the parent task to create this task as a subtask"New value: +"For tasks: The parent task ID for subtasks. When this is set, do not also provide projectName."
    • changedInput schema / properties / items / items / properties / parentTaskName / description
      Previous value: -"For tasks: The name of the parent task to create this task as a subtask"New value: +"For tasks: The parent task name for subtasks. Subtasks inherit project from their parent, so do not also provide projectName."
    • addedInput schema / properties / items / items / properties / plannedDate
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "The planned date in ISO format (YYYY-MM-DD or full ISO date)",
      +  "type": "string"
      +}
    • changedInput schema / properties / items / items / properties / projectName / description
      Previous value: -"For tasks: The name of the project to add the task to"New value: +"For tasks: The project name for top-level tasks. Omit this when parentTaskId or parentTaskName is set."
  2. First observedv1.0.0

TDQS

A3.6/5.0
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already indicate the tool is not read-only. The description adds no behavioral context beyond the fact it adds items; it does not disclose atomicity, error handling, limits, or what happens on conflict. Given the presence of annotations, the description adds minimal value.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, clear sentence with no unnecessary words, fully conveying the tool's purpose.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The tool has one parameter with nested objects fully described in the schema. The description is adequate for a batch add operation, though it lacks details on operational aspects like atomicity and partial failure handling.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, with all parameters described in the schema. The description adds no additional meaning beyond the schema, warranting the baseline score of 3.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action ('Add multiple tasks or projects to OmniFocus in a single operation'), distinguishing it from sibling tools like add_omnifocus_task (single task) and add_project (single project).

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies bulk usage but does not explicitly state when to use this tool over alternatives (e.g., adding items individually). No when-not or alternative guidance is provided.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/jqlts1/omnifocus-mcp-enhanced'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server