get_setup_template

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description provides one behavioral trait ('Read-only') but lacks additional detail such as authorization needs, rate limits, or potential side effects. Since no annotations are provided, the description carries the full burden for transparency, which it partially fulfills.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single sentence with no unnecessary words. It is front-loaded and efficient, delivering key information immediately.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple tool with one optional parameter and no output schema, the description adequately covers its purpose and behavior. It could mention the output format implications or typical use cases, but is largely complete given the low complexity.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% with one parameter (format) fully described via enum. The description adds 'Read-only' but no additional parameter-level meaning beyond what the schema provides. Baseline 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool returns a CloudFormation StackSet template for deploying a cross-account security audit IAM role. It includes a specific verb ('Returns') and resource, and is distinct from sibling tools which are mostly scan and report functions.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage but does not explicitly state when to use this tool versus alternatives or when not to use it. There is no mention of prerequisites or context for choosing this tool over others.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.