get_player_batting_stats

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided, so description carries full burden. Mentions returns 'stat lines with splits' but does not disclose rate limits, authorization needs, or data scope beyond defaults. Lacks detail on what 'splits' entail in practice.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two concise sentences, front-loaded with purpose, no wasted words. Each sentence adds essential information.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

No output schema; description only says 'Returns stat lines with splits' which is vague. Agent may not know exact fields returned. However, for a stats tool with common knowledge, it is borderline adequate.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, baseline 3. Description adds value by explaining default behavior ('top-level leagues') and how omitting all params yields all players for all seasons, which is not evident from the schema alone.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Clearly states verb 'Retrieve' and resource 'player batting statistics', distinguishing from sibling tools like get_player_fielding_stats and get_player_pitching_stats. Mentions key aspects: stat lines with splits, default scope, and optional parameters.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Provides explicit guidance on when to pass lid (for minor leagues) and when to omit all params (to get all players for all seasons). However, does not explicitly state when not to use this tool or mention alternatives for similar needs.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.