Skip to main content
Glama
joshuamyers22

gambit-mcp

Related Servers

Alternatives to gambit-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Provides read-only MCP tools for market snapshots, position risk, order reconciliation, and daily report previews with deterministic financial calculations, evidence chains, and audit trails.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Provides read-only access to OpenFolio data, enabling catalog, holdings, grid, and log queries without placing orders.
      4
      9 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Provides read-only investment research and audit tools for validating ETF snapshots, comparing ETF structures, and auditing backtest reports, while strictly excluding any order or trading capabilities.
      4
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      A read-only MCP server for EdgeDepth's market microstructure search engine, enabling users to query recorded crypto and TradFi perpetuals for market conditions, outcomes, and reproducibility-keyed evidence directly from MCP clients.
      10
      87 npm
      3
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables MCP clients to observe and inspect Sierra Chart chartbooks, charts, studies, drawings, and data, read diagnostics, and apply validated configuration changes via a local bridge, without any order execution or trading features.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Read-only MCP server for Blocksize real-time market data: crypto VWAP, bid/ask, FX, metals and tokenized equities, with pricing, coverage and x402 endpoint lookup. Signed-in users of the Claude, ChatGPT and Cursor connectors get 30,000 free live-data credits every month (1 credit = $0.001); subscriptions from EUR 49/month.
      7
      1
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4.5/5.0

    Scored across 1 tool

    Disambiguation5/5

    With only one tool, there is no possibility of confusing it with another. The description clearly states exactly what it validates and what it does not, leaving no ambiguity.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    The name 'gambit_check_contract' follows a clear verb_noun pattern and is readable. However, with only one tool, there is no broader naming convention to assess, and the redundant 'gambit_' prefix is slightly awkward.

    Tool Count3/5

    A single tool feels thin for a server, even one with a narrow scope. It is usable for its stated purpose but provides agents with a very limited surface.

    Completeness4/5

    The server's stated purpose is limited to checking contract compatibility for a pre-production adapter, and the tool fully covers that purpose. Missing capabilities like data validation or backtesting are explicitly out of scope, so they are not true gaps, but the surface is still minimal.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues