Comunio MCP
Related Servers
Alternatives to Comunio MCP
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceProvides AI assistants with commissioner-focused tools for fantasy sports leagues, enabling league overviews, standings, transactions, recaps, and manager activity across providers like Yahoo Fantasy.1MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI models to manage and query fantasy sports leagues through the Sleeper API, supporting tasks like player lookups, league activity, and draft management.117 npmMIT
- AlicenseBqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI agents to access Sleeper fantasy football league data, rosters, matchups, projections, waivers, trends, and league chat, with read-only safety and optional authorized chat posting.26MIT
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceEnables AI clients to read and write ESPN fantasy sports leagues using your own session cookies, including managing rosters, lineups, waiver claims, and free agent adds without a browser.171MIT
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to analyze Fantasy Premier League data, providing tools for player search, fixture analysis, manager comparisons, and strategy prompts for transfer planning and lineup selection.191MIT
- AlicenseBqualityBmaintenanceEnables reading Sleeper fantasy football rosters, matchups, standings, news, chat, and pick'em entries, with optional write actions for setting lineups, claiming waivers, and proposing trades.391MIT
TDQS
Scored across 19 tools
Each tool name clearly maps to a distinct action or query (e.g., get_squad vs get_standings vs get_market; place_bid vs change_bid vs withdraw_bid). The descriptions further clarify edge cases like the difference between `get_offers` (bids) and `get_transfers` (completed transfers). There's no ambiguity between tools.
Naming follows a consistent snake_case pattern: get_* for read operations and verb_noun for mutations (place_bid, withdraw_bid, set_lineup). The verb-object ordering is uniform across all tools, making the API predictable and easy to navigate.
At 18–19 tools, the surface is broad but each tool maps to a distinct, legitimate fantasy-manager action (view squad, bid, list, lineup, news). The count is on the high side but every tool earns its place; nothing feels redundant.
Core read/write coverage is strong: every state (account, squad, market, offers, transfers, standings, news, watchlist) has a reader and every user action (bid, list, price, lineup, accept, watch) has a mutator. Minor gaps: watchlist can be added to but not removed, and there is no way to decline an incoming offer.