A
licenseNot graded
qualityC
maintenanceEnables managing Microsoft To Do lists and tasks through MCP, including creating, updating, completing, deleting, searching, and checklist operations via Microsoft Graph.
MIT
Microsoft To Do MCP
by jordanburke
Related Servers
Alternatives to Microsoft To Do MCP
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceEnables AI agents to read and edit Microsoft To Do tasks, lists, and steps via Microsoft Graph, including due dates, reminders, and subtasks.121MIT
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceConnects Microsoft To Do to Claude, enabling task fetching, planning, completion, note-taking, and checklist management through natural language.9MIT
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceMCP server for Microsoft To Do that enables managing task lists, tasks, and checklist items via the Microsoft Graph API with zero-config authentication.132Apache 2.0
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables comprehensive Microsoft To Do task management through Microsoft Graph API with Entra ID OAuth authentication. Supports creating, updating, and managing todo lists, tasks, reminders, and due dates through natural language.-
- AlicenseBqualityCmaintenanceLets Claude and other AI clients read and modify Microsoft To Do through natural language, adding, completing, searching, updating, and deleting tasks and sub-steps by title and list name instead of ids. Personal Microsoft accounts need no Azure app registration — a single device-code sign-in grants access, with optional read-only and no-delete modes available.18MIT
TDQS
A3.6/5.0
Scored across 16 tools
Disambiguation3/5
There is overlap between get-task-lists and get-task-lists-organized, which both retrieve task lists but with different presentation formats. Other tools are distinct, but test-graph-api-exploration is vague and could be confused with exploration tasks. Overall, most tools are clearly delineated, but the near-duplicate pair creates ambiguity.
Naming Consistency4/5
Most tools follow a consistent verb_noun pattern (get-, create-, update-, delete-). Minor deviations include 'auth-status' (noun-like) and 'test-graph-api-exploration' (unusual object phrase), but these are slight and the majority are consistent. The pattern is mostly predictable.
Tool Count3/5
With 16 tools, the server sits at the borderline of what feels heavy for a Todo-focused MCP. It includes CRUD for lists, tasks, and checklist items, but also a redundant list retrieval and an exploratory tool, pushing the count slightly high. Still, the core coverage justifies the number.
Completeness4/5
The server provides full CRUD for task lists, tasks, and checklist items, which covers the main domain operations. Minor gaps include no singular 'get-task' or 'get-checklist-item' tools and no arbitrary task-moving operation, but these can be worked around with existing tools. Archiving and auth status round out the surface.
Maintenance
ActivitySlowing
ResponsivenessNo issues