Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to HacknPlan MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables Claude to interact with HacknPlan project management via the MCP protocol. Provides tools for managing projects, work items, boards, milestones, time logs, design models, and cross-project portfolio views.
      75
      8 npm
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables managing GitHub Projects v2 boards through Claude Code and Codex, including project and item administration, field updates, sprint boards, epic rollups, and desired-state planning.
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Connects Claude to a project-management account so it can list and manage projects, tasks, comments, and files through eight REST API tools, including creating and updating tasks and adding comments.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables Claude to connect to an OpenProject instance and query, search, and manage projects, work packages, users, and time entries through natural language. Supports advanced filtering, pagination, and creation of work packages like epics and user stories.
      13
      MIT

    TDQS

    C2.9/5.0

    Scored across 103 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Tools are clearly separated by resource type (board, milestone, design element, etc.) with distinct actions (create, get, update, replace, delete). However, the high number of tools and the presence of both update and replace for some resources could cause minor confusion, though descriptions clarify they are PATCH vs PUT.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern using lowercase and underscores. Verbs like create, get, list, update, delete, replace, close, reopen are used uniformly across resource types, with no mixing of conventions.

    Tool Count2/5

    With 103 tools, the set is very heavy. While each tool serves a specific purpose, many are redundant CRUD variants (e.g., separate replace_ and update_ for the same resource), and the overall count far exceeds typical MCP server scopes, making it unwieldy for agents.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool surface is remarkably comprehensive, covering all major entities (projects, boards, work items, milestones, design elements, roles, tags, stages, webhooks) with full CRUD, plus metrics, attachments, comments, and user management. Only minor gaps like bulk operations or advanced search are missing.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues