mcp-voice-hooks
Related Servers
Alternatives to mcp-voice-hooks
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- FlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceVoice input for Claude Code — speak Vietnamese or English; hold a hotkey, speak, release, and the transcribed text is cleaned and pasted into the input box for editing before sending.2-
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceEnables spoken conversations with Claude on a Mac: Claude speaks through speakers, listens to the user's natural replies, and transcribes them locally. No audio leaves the computer, and it includes tools for voice setup and a hands-free voice mode.2MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceVoice interface for Claude Code enabling hands-free, conversational interaction entirely on-device for Apple Silicon Macs. It provides push-to-talk transcription and automatic spoken responses via local AI models.MIT
- -licenseNot gradedqualityNot gradedmaintenanceA voice-enabled interface for Claude Desktop that supports speech-to-text input and text-to-speech output via ElevenLabs, turning Claude into a voice assistant.1-
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables Claude to speak text with an embedded audio player, supporting 54 voices, voice cloning, and playback controls, all running locally.3-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables bidirectional voice interaction for Claude Code using local speech-to-text and text-to-speech models optimized for Apple Silicon. It provides tools to listen to user speech via microphone and speak responses aloud through system speakers.16Apache 2.0
TDQS
Scored across 1 tool
With only one tool, there is no possibility of ambiguity or overlap between tools, as there are no other tools to compare it to. The tool's purpose is clearly defined and stands alone without confusion.
A single tool inherently has perfect naming consistency, as there are no other tool names to compare it against for patterns or conventions. The name 'speak' is straightforward and appropriate for its function.
A single tool is too few for most server purposes, as it limits functionality and flexibility. While it might suffice for a very narrow scope, it feels thin and incomplete for broader use cases, indicating a potential mismatch.
The server's domain appears to be voice or text-to-speech interactions, but with only a 'speak' tool, there are significant gaps. Missing operations like controlling speech parameters, managing utterances, or handling input make the surface severely incomplete for typical voice-related workflows.