The two tools perform clearly opposite-lifecycle actions: scaffold_project creates a new project, validate_project checks an existing one. There is no realistic way to confuse them, and both descriptions state the target resource explicitly.

Both names follow a clean verb_noun snake_case pattern (scaffold_project, validate_project). The convention is uniform with no deviations.

Two tools is thin for a server whose scope is the full FastMCP project lifecycle; it sits at the borderline where each tool is essential but the surface feels minimal. A handful more operations (e.g. add a tool, run tests) would make the set feel complete rather than a pair of one-off utilities.

Creation and validation are covered, but there is no way to modify an existing scaffold, inspect a project, or run/test it — an agent that scaffolds, edits, and then needs to regenerate or verify a broken project hits a dead end beyond a single validate call. Notable lifecycle gaps remain.