Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to FastMCP Forge

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables developers to define and register MCP tools and expose them over stdio or HTTP using JSON-RPC 2.0, with schema validation and manifest discovery.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables building lightweight MCP servers where Rust handles transport, routing, and schema validation while Python defines tool behavior using type hints, with support for stdio and HTTP transports.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      A minimal, decorator-based framework for building MCP servers in Python with zero dependencies. It enables you to define tools and resources via simple decorators, handling JSON-RPC protocol, type inference, and stdio transport automatically.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables turning any command-line tool into an MCP server with auto-generated JSON schema, supporting stdio, timeouts, and stderr capture.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables turning any Python function into an auto-registered MCP tool and serving them over a FastMCP server with auto-discovery, optional auth, and request context.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables building and running zero-dependency MCP servers with automatic JSON Schema generation, exposing Python tools to Claude Desktop, Cursor, and autonomous agent fleets.
      2
      Apache 2.0

    TDQS

    B3.3/5.0

    Scored across 2 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    The two tools perform clearly opposite-lifecycle actions: scaffold_project creates a new project, validate_project checks an existing one. There is no realistic way to confuse them, and both descriptions state the target resource explicitly.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    Both names follow a clean verb_noun snake_case pattern (scaffold_project, validate_project). The convention is uniform with no deviations.

    Tool Count3/5

    Two tools is thin for a server whose scope is the full FastMCP project lifecycle; it sits at the borderline where each tool is essential but the surface feels minimal. A handful more operations (e.g. add a tool, run tests) would make the set feel complete rather than a pair of one-off utilities.

    Completeness3/5

    Creation and validation are covered, but there is no way to modify an existing scaffold, inspect a project, or run/test it — an agent that scaffolds, edits, and then needs to regenerate or verify a broken project hits a dead end beyond a single validate call. Notable lifecycle gaps remain.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo recent community issues