read_audit_events
Retrieve recent normalized audit events from the platform to track user actions and system changes.
Instructions
Read recent normalized platform audit events.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| limit | No |
Retrieve recent normalized audit events from the platform to track user actions and system changes.
Read recent normalized platform audit events.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| limit | No |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided; description only says 'read' implying non-destructive but lacks details on authentication, rate limits, or time bounds.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single sentence, concise, but may be overly brief.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Despite low complexity, description omits important details like event types, ordering, and time range for 'recent'.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage 0% and description does not explain the 'limit' parameter meaning beyond schema constraints.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Description clearly states verb 'read' and resource 'normalized platform audit events', distinguishing it from sibling list/launch tools.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
Implied when to use (need audit events) but no explicit when-not or alternatives.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/joenukem/open-automation-platform-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server