launch_job_template

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description discloses the policy-check behavior, which is a key trait. However, it does not cover other behavioral aspects like return values, error states, or side effects.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is only two sentences, each providing essential information without redundancy. It is highly concise and front-loaded.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the complexity (6 params, no schema descriptions, no output schema, no annotations), the description is severely incomplete. It omits explanations for required parameters, return values, and optional parameter usage.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

With 0% schema description coverage, the description adds no meaning to the 6 parameters. The agent must infer from parameter names alone, which is insufficient for correct invocation.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states 'Launch a controller job template' with a specific verb and resource, distinguishing it from sibling tools like list_job_templates which list templates.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description mentions a policy check, implying a use case and hinting at policy_dry_run as an alternative for dry runs, but it does not explicitly state when to avoid this tool or list alternatives.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.