sprout-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to sprout-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceAn MCP server that enables AI assistants to access Sprout Social data including analytics, publishing, messages, and listening through a standardized interface.1833 npmMIT
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceMCP server to manage social media accounts from AI assistants, enabling post creation, scheduling, publishing, and media uploads across multiple platforms.1341 npm1MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceA full social media management MCP server enabling post, read, schedule, and analyze across Facebook, Instagram, LinkedIn, X/Twitter, Pinterest, and YouTube from any MCP-compatible AI client.MIT
- FlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceRead-only MCP server for the Sprout Social public API, exposing profile and post analytics as tools with raw JSON passthrough.5-

socialchamp-mcpofficial
AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceMCP server that exposes the full Social Champ tool catalog for scheduling and managing posts, channels, workspaces, labels, queues, and more through AI clients like Claude Desktop and Cursor.2MIT- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceMCP server for the Post for Me API, enabling publishing, scheduling, editing, deleting, and analyzing social media posts across 9 platforms from any MCP client.2726 npm1MIT
TDQS
Scored across 11 tools
Every tool has a clearly distinct purpose with no ambiguity. The tools cover separate domains like publishing (create_post, get_publishing_post), analytics (get_post_analytics, get_profile_analytics), inbox management (get_messages), and listing resources (list_* functions). Descriptions explicitly differentiate similar tools, such as get_messages for inbound messages versus get_post_analytics for outbound metrics.
All tools follow a consistent verb_noun pattern with snake_case throughout. The naming is highly predictable: 'create_post', 'get_messages', 'list_profiles', etc. There are no deviations in style or convention, making the set easy to navigate and understand at a glance.
With 11 tools, the count is well-scoped for a social media management server. Each tool earns its place by covering essential operations like publishing, analytics, and resource listing. This number is typical for such a domain (3-15 tools), providing comprehensive functionality without being overwhelming.
The tool surface is nearly complete for social media management, covering key areas like post creation, retrieval, analytics, and resource listing. Minor gaps exist, such as no update_post or delete_post tools for post lifecycle management, but agents can likely work around this by creating new posts or using existing tools for basic operations.