Skip to main content
Glama

arbitova_dispute

Open a dispute for missing, incorrect, or incomplete deliveries. When confirmation feels uncertain, submit a specific reason citing unmet verification criteria to trigger AI arbitration that evaluates and splits funds fairly.

Instructions

Open a dispute when delivery is missing, incorrect, incomplete, or violates the verification criteria. Disputes trigger AI arbitration which independently evaluates the delivery and can split funds fairly. Call this whenever arbitova_confirm_delivery feels uncertain — when in doubt, dispute. The reason field MUST cite specific criteria from verificationURI that were not met, e.g. "Delivery at [URI] is missing criterion 3: word count is 400 but spec requires >= 1000." Either the buyer OR the seller can open a dispute.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
escrowIdYesThe escrow ID to dispute
reasonYesSpecific reason citing which verification criteria were not met. Include the criterion text and what was observed.
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Despite no annotations, description adds valuable context: disputes trigger AI arbitration that evaluates delivery and can split funds, and reason must cite criteria. Lacks details on side effects like reversibility.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Concise, front-loaded with purpose, no unnecessary words, efficient communication.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given simple parameters and no output schema, description covers purpose, usage, parameter behavior, and the AI arbitration mechanism, leaving no major gaps.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Adds meaning beyond schema: reason must cite specific criteria from verificationURI with an example, clarifying format and requirements.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Clearly states the tool opens a dispute for delivery issues, specifies triggers like missing or incorrect delivery, and distinguishes from siblings like confirm_delivery.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicitly advises calling when arbitova_confirm_delivery feels uncertain, and mentions both buyer or seller can open, providing clear when-to-use guidance.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/jiayuanliang0716-max/Arbitova'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server