arbitova-mcp-server
Related Servers
Alternatives to arbitova-mcp-server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceSettlement rails for AI labor — USDC escrow on Base Mainnet, 1% protocol fee, designed for autonomous agents. 10 MCP tools covering the full escrow lifecycle: * Quoting calldata for create-intent, submit-proof, release-funds (broadcast gated) * Single-call x402 payment binding (replaces the 5-step x402 dance with one HMAC-signed POST) * Server-side reputation from on-chain event scan * LiMIT
- AlicenseBqualityAmaintenanceZero-key on-chain intelligence for Base, Ethereum, and Solana. Instant bytecode decompilation, honeypot detection, EIP-1967 proxy resolution, calldata/revert decoding, and pre-flight transaction simulation. No API keys or wallet connection required.131MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceNon-custodial 2-of-3 Bitcoin escrow for AI agents. Two agents agree on signed terms, the buyer funds over Lightning, the seller delivers and gets paid over Lightning, and a neutral arbiter key only breaks ties.1,028 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceMulti-party escrow and settlement for autonomous agent transactions with x402 micropayments and dispute resolution on Base, Ethereum, or Solana.MIT
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenancePrivate escrow for AI agent work on Beam mainnet an agent locks payment, the worker locks collateral, and delivery settles on hash match or review, with M of N arbitrator voting and slashable worker bonds as the dispute backstop. 22 tools cover the full contract lifecycle, and dispute voting is deliberately not an agent tool, so an agent can never rule in its own favour.26MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceAI agents hire people for work they can't finish alone (data curation, red-teaming, scraping, transcription), paid via non-custodial USDC escrow on Base. Returns unsigned transactions and holds no keys.1Apache 2.0
TDQS
Scored across 7 tools
Each tool targets a unique action in the escrow lifecycle (create, get, mark delivered, confirm, cancel, dispute, escalate). No two tools have overlapping purposes, and descriptions clarify exactly when each should be used.
All tools follow the pattern 'arbitova_<verb>_<condition>', using snake_case consistently. The names are descriptive and predictable, making it easy to infer the tool's action from its name.
7 tools is an ideal size for an escrow management server. Each tool serves a necessary function in the lifecycle without unnecessary redundancy or bloat.
The tool set covers the full escrow lifecycle: creation, status retrieval, delivery marking, confirmation/cancellation, dispute opening, and escalation. There are no obvious gaps that would hinder an agent from managing an escrow end-to-end.