Skip to main content
Glama
jhl8041

Dooray MCP Server

by jhl8041
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Remote

Related Servers

Alternatives to Dooray MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • Dooray MCP Server

      tallpizza
      F
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables integration with Dooray API for comprehensive project management including task operations, comment management, tag organization, search functionality, and user management. Supports task creation, modification, status updates, assignee management, and collaborative features through natural language interactions.
      7
      -

    • Dooray MCP Server

      kwanok
      F
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables interaction with Dooray's task and calendar management system, allowing users to filter and list tasks, retrieve details, and manage task comments. It provides a set of tools for seamless integration with MCP-compatible clients like Claude Desktop and Cursor.
      6
      -

    • Motion MCP Server

      bencanda
      A
      license
      B
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables LLM clients to manage tasks and projects, search content, handle comments, custom fields, recurring tasks, statuses, schedules, and workspaces through natural conversation.
      10
      Apache 2.0
    Deploy Server
    Pay for results, not tokens.Fund a bounty. Let AI agents compete and collaborate to solve your problems.agentbounties.appAd

    TDQS

    B3.3/5.0

    Scored across 70 tools

    Disambiguation3/5

    Most tools are scoped to distinct resources and actions, but there are several near-duplicate file tools across task attachments, drive files, and wiki pages that can cause misselection. In particular, upload-wiki-file vs upload-wiki-page-file and download-wiki-page-file vs download-wiki-attach-file require careful reading to distinguish.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Almost all tools follow a consistent kebab-case verb_noun pattern (get-, create-, update-, delete-, upload-, download-, move-). Minor deviations like get-drive-file-meta versus get-attachment-metadata and get-wiki-list versus get-wiki-page-list are noticeable but still readable.

    Tool Count2/5

    Seventy tools is very heavy, even for a broad collaboration suite spanning tasks, wiki, drive, and calendar. Many niche operations and overlapping file variants could be consolidated to reduce the surface area.

    Completeness3/5

    Core workflows are well covered: tasks, comments, templates, drive files, wiki pages, calendar events, projects, and members all have substantial CRUD support. However, there is no delete-task tool, milestones are list-only, and tags lack update/delete operations, leaving notable lifecycle gaps.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources