speechwire_get_round_schematic

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations exist; description details return structure but does not mention side effects, permissions, or safety. It adds context beyond basic schema but insufficient for full behavioral transparency.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Description is brief and well-organized with Parameters and Returns sections. Every sentence contributes necessary detail without redundancy.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The description covers parameters and return structure, referencing a related tool. Missing error handling or edge cases, but adequate for a straightforward retrieval tool.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage 0%, so description must add meaning. It explains grouping_id as 'Event grouping identifier from speechwire_list_schematic_events' and round_number as 'Round number for this event,' adding value over schema titles.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description explicitly states 'Get the full schematic (pairings/sections) for a specific event round,' with clear verb and resource. It references grouping_id from speechwire_list_schematic_events, linking to sibling context.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description specifies parameters and their origins (grouping_id from list_schematic_events), implying when to use this tool. However, it lacks explicit when-to-use or when-not-to-use guidance.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.