SpeechWire MCP Server
Related Servers
Alternatives to SpeechWire MCP Server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol (MCP) server that provides AI assistants with secure access to your Google Docs.1MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol server that provides AI models with structured access to external data and services, acting as a bridge between AI assistants and applications, databases, and APIs in a standardized, secure way.2-
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityFmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol (MCP) server that provides AI assistants full access to the Motion task and project management API, enabling task, project, and schedule management.-
- FlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol server implementation that can be run directly or through Docker, enabling AI assistants to interact with external systems through the MCP standard.2-
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceAn MCP server that enables AI agents to serve as a Public Forum debate partner, with a searchable card library, verbatim evidence cutting that rejects fabricated text, OpenCaselist scouting, and Verbatim-compatible .docx export.16MIT

OpenStride MCP Serverofficial
AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceModel Context Protocol (MCP) server that allows AI assistants to access and analyze your OpenStride training data.9 npmMIT
TDQS
Scored across 24 tools
Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose. Judge tools are specific (list, add, get school/contact/availability, update email/availability/school), room tools (list, get usage, get counts) are separate, and team/entry/schedule/schematic tools are all unambiguous. No overlapping functionality.
All tools follow the consistent pattern 'speechwire_verb_noun' with verbs like list, get, add, select, update. No mixing of conventions (e.g., camelCase) and no irregular naming.
24 tools is well-scoped for a tournament management server covering account selection, tournament selection, judges (CRUD + queries), rooms, teams, entries, schedule, schematics, and results. Each tool serves a distinct function without bloat.
Core workflows for judge management, room allocation, scheduling, and results are covered. Minor gaps exist: no delete judge tool and no update tools for rooms, teams, or entries. However, the surface is robust for most common tasks.