A
licenseNot graded
qualityC
maintenanceA Model Context Protocol (MCP) server that provides AI assistants with secure access to your Google Docs.
1
MIT
SpeechWire MCP Server
Related Servers
Alternatives to SpeechWire MCP Server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol server that provides AI models with structured access to external data and services, acting as a bridge between AI assistants and applications, databases, and APIs in a standardized, secure way.2-
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityFmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol (MCP) server that provides AI assistants full access to the Motion task and project management API, enabling task, project, and schedule management.-
- FlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol server implementation that can be run directly or through Docker, enabling AI assistants to interact with external systems through the MCP standard.2-
OpenStride MCP Serverofficial
AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceModel Context Protocol (MCP) server that allows AI assistants to access and analyze your OpenStride training data.7 npmMIT- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol server that enables AI assistants to securely fetch and extract readable text content from web pages through a standardized interface.1MIT
TDQS
A4.2/5.0
Scored across 24 tools
Disambiguation5/5
Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose. Judge tools are specific (list, add, get school/contact/availability, update email/availability/school), room tools (list, get usage, get counts) are separate, and team/entry/schedule/schematic tools are all unambiguous. No overlapping functionality.
Naming Consistency5/5
All tools follow the consistent pattern 'speechwire_verb_noun' with verbs like list, get, add, select, update. No mixing of conventions (e.g., camelCase) and no irregular naming.
Tool Count5/5
24 tools is well-scoped for a tournament management server covering account selection, tournament selection, judges (CRUD + queries), rooms, teams, entries, schedule, schematics, and results. Each tool serves a distinct function without bloat.
Completeness4/5
Core workflows for judge management, room allocation, scheduling, and results are covered. Minor gaps exist: no delete judge tool and no update tools for rooms, teams, or entries. However, the surface is robust for most common tasks.
Maintenance
ActivitySlowing
ResponsivenessUnresponsive