Skip to main content
Glama
jeonghwanko

coffee-price-mcp

by jeonghwanko

Server Configuration

Describes the environment variables required to run the server.

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
COFFEE_API_BASENo혜택 API 베이스. 로컬 개발 시 http://localhost:4000https://coffee.pryzm.gg/api

Instructions

Guidance the server publishes about itself, which clients place ahead of the tool catalog so the model reads it before choosing anything.

This server publishes no instructions, or was last inspected before Glama recorded them.

Capabilities

Features and capabilities supported by this server

Protocol revision2025-11-25

CapabilityDetails
tools
{
  "listChanged": true
}

Tools

Functions exposed to the LLM to take actions

NameDescription
get_cheapest_coffeeA

오늘 가장 싸게 먹을 수 있는 커피 TOP N. 보유 멤버십/카드를 주면 받을 수 있는 혜택만 골라 체감가(정가-할인) 오름차순으로 랭킹한다.

search_coffee_dealsB

커피 혜택 검색/필터 (브랜드·통신사/카드사·유형·키워드·오늘만). 각 혜택의 체감가를 함께 반환한다.

verify_receipt_priceA

내가 낸 커피 가격이 적정한지 점검. 정가와 오늘 최저 체감가를 비교해 great/fair/overpaid 판정 + 더 나은 혜택을 제시한다. (영수증 제출이 아니라 가격 점검용 read-only)

Prompts

Interactive templates invoked by user choice

NameDescription

No prompts

Resources

Contextual data attached and managed by the client

NameDescription

No resources

TDQS

A3.9/5.0

Scored across 3 tools

Disambiguation5/5

Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: get_cheapest_coffee ranks top deals based on user memberships, search_coffee_deals provides flexible filtering, and verify_receipt_price checks a given price against current deals. No overlap or ambiguity.

Naming Consistency5/5

All tools use the verb_noun pattern in snake_case: get_cheapest_coffee, search_coffee_deals, verify_receipt_price. The convention is perfectly consistent.

Tool Count4/5

With 3 tools, the count is slightly low but appropriate for a focused price-checking domain. Each tool earns its place, and expanding to 4-5 would not harm, but the current count is reasonable.

Completeness4/5

The tools cover key operations: retrieving cheapest options, searching/filtering deals, and verifying a receipt price. Minor gaps exist, such as lacking a tool to list all brands or deals without filtering, but the core workflows are well-supported.

Maintenance

ActivityInactive
ResponsivenessNo issues