coffee-price-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to coffee-price-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceMCP server for querying Percolate's specialty coffee database with read-only access to 1,100+ coffees, tasting profiles, brew recipes, pairings, and recommendations.8185 npmMIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server that finds great espresso cafes using a curated database of specialty coffee shops and a transparent scoring algorithm, with a strong bias against flavored syrups and mass-market chains.622 npmMIT
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceEnables searching public Kupi.cz discount offers, comparing store prices, and approximating shopping list optimization through a read-only MCP interface.3MIT
- FlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceMCP server that recommends coffee based on preferences (mood, milk, caffeine, temperature) from a static menu; includes tools for listing menu, recommending, and explaining recommendations.3-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceMCP server for the Roastify Developer API, letting AI agents browse the coffee catalog and generate packaging artwork, with paid tools settled in Bitcoin Lightning.Apache 2.0
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceAn MCP server that tells an AI assistant what's on sale at grocery stores near any US ZIP code by reading weekly circulars and providing fast, queryable deal data.8MIT
TDQS
Scored across 3 tools
Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: get_cheapest_coffee ranks top deals based on user memberships, search_coffee_deals provides flexible filtering, and verify_receipt_price checks a given price against current deals. No overlap or ambiguity.
All tools use the verb_noun pattern in snake_case: get_cheapest_coffee, search_coffee_deals, verify_receipt_price. The convention is perfectly consistent.
With 3 tools, the count is slightly low but appropriate for a focused price-checking domain. Each tool earns its place, and expanding to 4-5 would not harm, but the current count is reasonable.
The tools cover key operations: retrieving cheapest options, searching/filtering deals, and verifying a receipt price. Minor gaps exist, such as lacking a tool to list all brands or deals without filtering, but the core workflows are well-supported.