pincushion-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to pincushion-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceInteractive feedback layer that lets users pin comments on live web apps with auto-captured context (failing requests, console, AI metadata), and coding agents fix issues via MCP, turning pins green upon verification.1022 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI coding agents to pull, triage, and resolve user feedback pinned directly on live web prototypes via MCP tools.46 npm2MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceMCP server for visual feedback, video direction, and QA assertions on web pages, enabling AI agents to read, reply, and resolve annotations in real time.6MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceHuman-to-AI code review bridge. Annotate UI elements in the browser with review comments, and AI agents read the feedback via MCP to fix code automatically — with full element context (CSS selector, styles, DOM path, accessibility info). 10 MCP tools, framework-agnostic Web Component, zero-config install via uvx.9-

twocentsofficial
AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceA remote MCP server that lets AI agents share HTML pages with real people for visual review and collect their pinned notes as actionable feedback.MIT- FlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceMCP server that exposes web page annotations to AI coding agents, enabling automated implementation of visual feedback and design tweaks.4 npm163-
TDQS
Scored across 39 tools
Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose with detailed descriptions. Even closely related tools (e.g., get_actionable_pins vs get_selected_pins, implement_approved_pins vs get_implementation_packet) are well differentiated by their specific use cases and triggers, minimizing the risk of misselection.
All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun or verb_adjective_noun pattern in snake_case. Verbs like 'get', 'create', 'add', 'remove', 'list', 'configure', 'claim', 'resolve', etc., are used predictably, making the naming intuitive and easy to parse.
With 39 tools, the count is high but justifiable given the breadth of functionality (project setup, member management, pin lifecycle, collaboration integrations, critique, metrics, sharing, etc.). Each tool serves a clear purpose, though some niche tools (e.g., claim_pending_slack_install) could potentially be consolidated.
The tool set covers the full feedback management lifecycle: project configuration, context retrieval, pin creation/state management (claim, assign, approve, resolve, verify), replies, search, reporting, collaboration integrations, metrics, and setup instructions. No obvious dead ends or missing essential operations for the domain.