list_notes
List notes in a folder or account to organize and view your Apple Notes data.
Instructions
List notes in a folder or account
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| folder | No | Folder name (omit for all notes) | |
| account | No | Account name |
List notes in a folder or account to organize and view your Apple Notes data.
List notes in a folder or account
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| folder | No | Folder name (omit for all notes) | |
| account | No | Account name |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided, so the description carries full burden. It only says 'List notes' implying read-only, but lacks details on pagination, sorting, return format, or side effects.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Extremely concise (1 sentence, 8 words). Structure is simple and front-loaded, but could benefit from more details without losing conciseness.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given no output schema and no annotations, the description is too minimal. It fails to clarify behavior when both folder and account are provided, or what fields are returned.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema covers 100% of parameters with descriptions. The tool's description reinforces that folder and account scope the listing, adding context to the schema.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the action (list) and resource (notes). However, it does not differentiate itself from siblings like search_notes or get_recent_notes, leaving ambiguity about when to use this tool.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool vs alternatives such as search_notes or get_note. No when-not or prerequisites mentioned.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/jayprajapati/apple-noteagent-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server