Skip to main content
Glama
jaspertvdm

mcp-server-sensory

by jaspertvdm
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to mcp-server-sensory

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • bus-mcp

      Pan-Robotics
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server for Raspberry Pi peripheral bus access, enabling AI agents to interact with CAN, I2C, SPI, UART, and GPIO directly through natural language.
      2
      MIT

    • voidsend-mcp

      JamshedMemon
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server for VoidSend enabling AI agents to send and receive end-to-end encrypted messages.
      6 npm
      MIT

    • mimoe-agent

      dcaicedo
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server for the mimOE AI Agent, enabling on-device tools like device discovery, network insight, and persistent note storage via natural language.
      -

    • oracle-tmux-mcp

      JonusNattapong
      F
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server that gives AI agents a live, tmux-backed messaging mesh for instant message delivery without polling.
      7
      -
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    B3.4/5.0

    Scored across 14 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Tools are mostly distinct by format and action, but 'braille_binary_grid' and 'braille_punchcard' both generate patterns with some overlap, and 'transcode' is vague. Overall, agents can usually differentiate.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Naming follows a consistent snake_case pattern and typically starts with the sensory type (e.g., braille_, morse_, sstv_), except for 'transcode' and 'reflux_decode'. The pattern is not strictly verb_noun but is predictable.

    Tool Count5/5

    With 14 tools covering three sensory formats plus a transcode utility, the count is well-scoped and each tool serves a clear purpose. Not too few or too many.

    Completeness3/5

    The set covers Braille and Morse encoding/decoding well, but SSTV lacks a standalone decode tool (only a composite pipeline via reflux_decode). Other sensory formats are omitted, leaving minor gaps.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources