Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to gitlab-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server for interacting with GitLab API, supporting both self-hosted instances and gitlab.com. Provides tools for managing issues, merge requests, code review, pipelines, milestones, releases, search, and file access.
      403 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      C
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      A production-ready MCP server for GitLab enabling AI assistants to read and manage GitLab projects, merge requests, issues, pipelines, wikis, releases, and more through a unified interface.
      100
      403 npm
      10
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      A comprehensive GitLab MCP server that enables AI clients to manage projects, merge requests, issues, pipelines, wiki, releases, tags, and milestones through multiple transports and authentication methods.
      70,206 npm
      MIT

    TDQS

    B3.1/5.0

    Scored across 33 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a distinct resource and action. The runner-related tools are clearly differentiated by scope (user, all, project, group) and operation (list, get, update, delete, assign, unassign, reset, verify). Even similar reset token tools specify their method (by runner ID vs. current token) in the name.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern using snake_case, such as get_project, list_merge_requests, update_runner, and reset_runner_authentication_token_by_current_token. The naming is predictable and easy to navigate, despite some longer composite names.

    Tool Count2/5

    With 33 tools, the server exceeds the 25-tool threshold for 'too many'. While GitLab has a broad API, the set includes a very large number of runner-specific endpoints (about 20 runner-related tools) plus two unusual analytics tools, making the overall surface feel overloaded and less focused.

    Completeness2/5

    The server is heavily read-oriented for core resources (projects, merge requests, pipelines, commits) and lacks create/update/delete operations for these. Runner management is comprehensive, but the overall GitLab domain is incomplete—agents cannot create a project, update or merge a merge request, or cancel a pipeline, leaving significant gaps.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues