master_chain_apply

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description explains that the tool replaces the master chain with an EQ + Comp + Limiter chain, which is transparent about the core behavior. However, it does not mention side effects such as removing existing chain plugins, whether the operation is destructive, or if it is undoable.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is concise and front-loaded, with the main action stated first. The additional detail about templates is relevant and presented without unnecessary filler.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple parameterized tool, the description provides enough context to understand what happens and how to choose a template. It could mention whether the existing master chain is discarded or preserved, but overall it is sufficient.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The sole parameter `template` is fully documented by the description, which lists all allowed values and describes their intended use cases. The schema also enforces the enum, so there is no ambiguity.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action: replace the master chain with a named template. It also lists the available templates, making the tool's purpose unambiguous.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description does not explicitly say when to use this tool versus alternatives such as individual EQ or compression tools. It implies template selection based on target use case but gives no direct guidance on when replacing the whole chain is preferable.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.