Skip to main content
Glama
jamesmurdza

Daytona Playwright MCP Server

by jamesmurdza

Related Servers

Alternatives to Daytona Playwright MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      MCP server to control a real Chrome browser from Claude, enabling navigation, DOM snapshots, clicks, typing, screenshots, and JS execution via a Chrome extension bridge.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server to control Chrome browsers locally or remotely via the Claude extension, enabling navigation, form filling, screenshots, and JavaScript execution from any MCP client.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Local browser automation MCP server for Claude Code, enabling navigation, clicking, typing, and inspecting real web pages via Google Chrome.
      17 npm
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      An MCP server that provides AI models with full browser automation capabilities through Chrome. It enables navigation, interaction, screenshots, and complete DevTools access by bridging AI clients with a companion Chrome extension.
      99
      4 npm
      3
      Apache 2.0
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      An MCP server that gives Claude a real, persistent Chrome browser with logged-in sessions, enabling automation of sites that block headless browsers. It supports 50+ tools, cross-session knowledge, and recipe replay for complex workflows.
      -

    TDQS

    A3.6/5.0

    Scored across 26 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose with no ambiguity. For example, browser_click is for clicking, browser_type is for typing, browser_screenshot is for capturing images, and browser_wait_for_selector is for waiting on element states. The descriptions reinforce these distinctions, making misselection unlikely.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tools follow a consistent 'browser_verb' or 'browser_verb_noun' naming pattern (e.g., browser_back, browser_click, browser_screenshot). This uniformity makes the tool set predictable and easy to navigate, with no deviations in style or convention.

    Tool Count3/5

    With 26 tools, the count feels heavy for a browser automation server, though not extreme. While it covers many operations, some tools could potentially be consolidated (e.g., browser_back and browser_forward are simple navigations), making the set borderline in scope.

    Completeness5/5

    The tool set provides complete coverage for browser automation, including session management (start, stop, status), navigation, interaction (click, type, hover), inspection (get_html, get_text), and utilities (screenshot, download). There are no obvious gaps, and agents can handle typical workflows without dead ends.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues