slipbox_list_notes_by_date

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description must carry the safety and behavior burden. It discloses the core behavior: filtering by created_at or updated_at via the use_updated flag, with defaults for limit. It also clarifies that dates are optional, implying unfiltered listing when omitted. No destructive side effects are implied.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is concise: a one-line summary, a usage note, and a structured list of arguments. No redundant text or filler.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple list tool, the description covers the purpose, usage context, all parameters with defaults and format, and the alternative date field. It could mention ordering or behavior with no dates, but these are implicit. Overall it is sufficiently complete for the tool's complexity.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, so the description fully compensates by explaining each parameter: start_date and end_date in ISO format, use_updated as a filter switch, and limit as maximum results with defaults. This is exactly what an agent needs to invoke the tool correctly.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description opens with 'List notes by creation or update date,' a specific verb and resource, clearly distinguishing from siblings like search_notes or get_note. It explicitly describes the date-based filtering functionality.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description includes 'Useful for reviewing recent work or finding notes from a specific period,' providing clear use-case context. It does not explicitly name alternative tools or mention when not to use it, but the guidance is sufficient for a straightforward list tool.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.