Skip to main content
Glama
jamesfishwick

Slipbox MCP Server

Related Servers

Alternatives to Slipbox MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A local MCP server that gives AI agents structured access to a personal Obsidian knowledge vault, with semantic search, organization through Maps of Content, and git-backed history.
      -
    • A
      license
      C
      quality
      F
      maintenance
      An MCP server that integrates the zk note-taking system with LLMs, enabling users to search, read, create, and manage notes. It provides tools for link analysis, tag management, and complex note queries to interact with local knowledge bases.
      5
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server that treats Obsidian vaults as knowledge graphs, enabling AI agents to traverse wikilinks, assemble token-budgeted context, and search with backlink awareness.
      3 npm
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A local-first MCP server that gives AI assistants long-term memory by storing, searching, and recalling notes as Markdown files on your machine.
      8 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A lightweight MCP server that enables AI assistants to securely read, create, and modify notes in an Obsidian vault, with support for semantic search and web scraping.
      3,187 npm
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.8/5.0

    Scored across 19 tools

    Disambiguation3/5

    Most tools target a distinct resource/action, but slipbox_delete_link and slipbox_remove_link are near-duplicates that differ only in error behavior, and get_cluster_report with refresh=true overlaps with refresh_clusters. The descriptions clarify the differences, but an agent could still easily select the wrong tool.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Names consistently follow a slipbox_verb_noun pattern with clear domain vocabulary. Minor inconsistencies remain: delete_link vs remove_link use different verbs for the same logical operation, and search_notes sits alongside find_similar_notes, find_central_notes, and find_orphaned_notes.

    Tool Count4/5

    At 19 tools, this is above the typical well-scoped range, but the extra surface is justified by distinct note CRUD, link management, graph analytics, and cluster maintenance features. It feels slightly heavy rather than bloated.

    Completeness4/5

    The server covers note and link lifecycles, search and tag discovery, graph analysis, and cluster-driven structure creation, so core Zettelkasten workflows are supported. Minor gaps exist, such as no dedicated list-all-notes tool and link edits requiring delete/recreate, but agents can work around them.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessResponsive