Skip to main content
Glama
jamalkamaladdin

pixelpact

by jamalkamaladdin
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to pixelpact

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • figma-diff

      atinseau
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables agents to compare a live web page against a Figma frame and receive a bounded JSON verdict of design deviations, without sending screenshots or mockups through the model context.
      MIT

    • agent-eyes

      oljodev
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI coding agents to see, measure, and verify web pages through a real Chrome browser, including screenshots, responsive layout and accessibility audits, pixel diffing against baselines, secure logins, and deployed-fix verification.
      27
      1
      MIT

    • websight

      h34tsink
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to see, analyze, and visually verify web page changes through pixel-perfect diffing, theme extraction, layout analysis, and interactive element detection.
      0
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A4.5/5.0

    Scored across 4 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a distinct role in a clear pipeline: extract_contract (capture), check_implementation (structural compare), diff_pixels (pixel compare), and read_contract_summary (inspect metadata). The descriptions explicitly differentiate the two comparison tools and state their prerequisites, leaving little chance of misselection.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All four names follow a consistent snake_case verb_noun pattern (extract_contract, check_implementation, diff_pixels, read_contract_summary). The convention is predictable and readable throughout.

    Tool Count4/5

    Four tools is a tight, well-scoped set that maps cleanly onto the extract-then-verify workflow, with no redundant operations. It is slightly lean — no management tools (list/delete/update contracts) — but each tool clearly earns its place.

    Completeness4/5

    The core lifecycle is covered end to end: extract a contract, structurally verify, pixel-verify, and inspect a saved contract. Minor gaps exist (no way to list or delete contracts, no threshold/viewport configuration tool), but these are workarounds an agent can manage.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources