pixelpact
Allows extracting a design contract from a Figma frame via the REST API and using the frame as the reference for implementation checks.
Allows running pixelpact checks in GitHub Actions and posting a comment on the pull request with the results.
Click on "Install Server".
Wait a few minutes for the server to deploy. Once ready, it will show a "Started" state.
In the chat, type
@followed by the MCP server name and your instructions, e.g., "@pixelpactCompare my checkout page to the Figma design and report the deviations."
That's it! The server will respond to your query, and you can continue using it as needed.
Here is a step-by-step guide with screenshots.
Measure a UI against the design it is supposed to match, before any baseline exists.
Someone says the page is done. You look at it and it does not match. Nothing in the room is measured, so the conversation becomes opinion: that gap looks too big, no it does not.
pixelpact reads the reference, a live page or a Figma frame, and writes down what it actually renders: sizes, colors, spacing, typography, hover and focus states, animation keyframes, design tokens. That file is the contract. Point pixelpact at your implementation and it answers with numbers, one line per property that drifted.
npx pixelpact extract https://reference.example.com -o contract.json
npx pixelpact check contract.json http://localhost:3000Works with
Playwright | MCP clients | GitHub Actions | Figma | Any framework |
the engine it drives | agents measure their own work | one comment on the pull request | frames as the reference | it reads the DOM, not your stack |
If a browser can render it, pixelpact can measure it.
Related MCP server: websight
Why this is not visual regression testing
Percy, Chromatic, Applitools, BackstopJS and Pixeleye all compare your page against a baseline that you approved earlier. That model works once the page already looks right and you want to keep it that way. While you are still building toward a design, there is no baseline to compare with, and the first run of a regression tool simply records whatever you produced.
Visual regression tools | pixelpact | |
Compares against | a snapshot you approved earlier | the reference design itself |
Useful when | the UI is already correct | the UI is being built |
First run on a new page | records, cannot judge | measures against the reference |
Answer you get | an image diff to inspect by eye | a value per property, with a delta |
Fits an autonomous agent | needs a human to approve the diff | the numbers close the loop |
The two models are complementary. Use a regression tool to keep a finished page finished, and pixelpact to get it finished in the first place.
Problems pixelpact solves
Without pixelpact | With pixelpact |
❌ Someone says the section is finished, you disagree, and neither of you has a number. The louder opinion wins. | ✅ Every value in the reference is asserted against your page. What failed is listed with expected, actual and the difference. |
❌ A regression tool has nothing to compare a brand new page against, so its first run records whatever you happened to build. | ✅ The reference is the baseline from the first minute. Nothing has to be approved before the tool is useful. |
❌ A coding agent writes CSS, declares it done, and a person has to open the page to find out that it is not. | ✅ The agent calls the MCP server, reads the deviations, fixes them and checks again. No person in the middle. |
❌ Hover, focus and animation values are almost never reviewed, because checking them by hand is slow and boring. | ✅ They are part of the contract, so they are measured on every run like any other value. |
❌ An image diff tells you that something changed and leaves you to hunt for what. | ✅ Deviations name the element, the property, the expected value and the measured one. |
❌ The design lives in a file nobody opens during code review. | ✅ The contract is committed JSON, so a pull request shows exactly which values moved. |
Install
pnpm add -D pixelpact playwright
pnpm exec playwright install chromiumplaywright is a peer dependency, so the browser download stays under your control and a
project that already has Playwright installs nothing extra. Node 22.12 or newer is required.
Quickstart
1. Extract the contract from the reference.
npx pixelpact extract https://reference.example.com \
--selector "main" \
--viewport desktop,mobile \
--screenshots .pixelpact/shots \
-o contract.json2. Measure your implementation.
npx pixelpact check contract.json http://localhost:3000 --viewport desktop3. Fix what it reports, then run it again. The command exits 0 when everything is inside
tolerance and 1 when it is not, so it drops straight into a script or a CI job.
From Figma instead of a live page
extract recognises a Figma url and reads the frame through the REST API. No browser is
launched for this step.
export FIGMA_TOKEN=figd_...
npx pixelpact extract "https://www.figma.com/design/KEY/Name?node-id=12-345" -o contract.json
npx pixelpact check contract.json http://localhost:3000A Figma layer has no CSS selector, so a Figma contract binds to your markup through
data-contract attributes. Name the element after the layer and matching stops depending on
how the design happened to nest its frames:
<a class="btn btn-primary" data-contract="Hero/CTA">Get started</a>Anything with no match is reported as missing rather than guessed from tag names.
What a contract looks like
A contract is plain JSON, readable and diffable, with no proprietary format and no service behind it.
{
"version": 1,
"source": { "type": "url", "value": "https://reference.example.com" },
"root": "main",
"extractedAt": "2026-09-06T01:20:44.812Z",
"viewports": [{ "name": "desktop", "width": 1440, "height": 900 }],
"tokens": { "--brand-600": "rgb(11, 114, 133)" },
"keyframes": { "fade-up": [{ "offset": "0%", "css": "opacity: 0" }] },
"byViewport": {
"desktop": {
"documentHeight": 4218,
"elements": [
{
"selector": "main > header > a.cta",
"tag": "a",
"text": "Get started",
"box": { "x": 120, "y": 32, "w": 148, "h": 44 },
"styles": {
"background-color": "rgb(11, 114, 133)",
"font-size": "16px",
"border-radius": "8px"
},
"hover": { "background-color": "rgb(8, 90, 105)" },
"focus": { "outline": "2px solid rgb(11, 114, 133)" }
}
]
}
}
}Because it is a file, you can commit it, review it in a pull request, hand it to another developer, or hand it to an agent.
What a check prints
pixelpact check FAILED
target http://localhost:4173/impl.html
reference http://localhost:4173/ref.html
viewport desktop 1440x900
elements 14 matched, 0 missing of 14
checks 1056 passed, 10 failed (99.1% of 1066)
deviations (10)
SELECTOR PROPERTY EXPECTED ACTUAL DIFF
body > main > h1 font-size 48px 44px 4px
body > main > a box.width 117.75px 109.75px 8px
body > main > a padding-right 24px 20px 4px
body > main > a padding-left 24px 20px 4px
body > main > a background-color rgb(11, 114, 133) rgb(37, 99, 235) 60.1 (color)
body > main > a border-top-left-radius 8px 4px 4px
body > main > a border-top-right-radius 8px 4px 4px
body > main > a border-bottom-left-ra... 8px 4px 4px
body > main > a border-bottom-right-r... 8px 4px 4px
body > main > a focus.outline rgb(11, 114, 133) s... rgb(37, 99, 235) so... differsThat is a real run against two copies of one page with four declarations changed. Four edits
produce ten measured deviations, because padding moves the box width and one border-radius
shorthand sets four corners. Run the same check against the reference itself and all 1066
assertions pass, which is the property that matters: a passing check has to mean something.
Add --json to get the same report as a data structure, which is what CI jobs and agents read.
Features
Commands
Command | What it does |
| Reads the reference and writes a contract file |
| Measures an implementation, prints deviations, sets exit code |
| Pixel comparison against the screenshot stored in the contract |
Shared flags cover the browser context (--viewport, --selector, --wait, --timeout,
--locale, --timezone, --channel, --headful), the output (--out, --json,
--quiet), and the parts of extraction you may want to cap (--max-elements, --max-states,
--mask). Run pixelpact <command> --help for the full list.
Exit codes
Code | Meaning |
| Everything inside tolerance |
| Deviations found, or the pixel threshold was exceeded |
| Usage error, for example a bad flag or a contract file that is missing |
| Runtime failure, for example no browser available or the page would not load |
Programmatic use
import { extract, check, formatCheckReport, writeContract } from 'pixelpact-core'
const contract = await extract({
url: 'https://reference.example.com',
selector: 'main',
screenshotDir: '.pixelpact/shots',
})
await writeContract('contract.json', contract)
const report = await check(contract, { url: 'http://localhost:3000' })
console.log(formatCheckReport(report, { color: true }))
if (!report.ok) process.exitCode = 1Everything is typed, and the contract and report shapes are validated at the boundary, so a malformed file fails with a readable message instead of a stack trace.
For coding agents
An agent that writes UI code cannot tell whether it succeeded. pixelpact-mcp gives it the
measurement, so the loop closes without a person in the middle: extract the contract once,
then let the agent check its own work, read the deviation list, fix, and check again.
// .mcp.json
{
"mcpServers": {
"pixelpact": { "command": "npx", "args": ["-y", "pixelpact-mcp"] }
}
}Tools exposed: extract_contract, check_implementation, diff_pixels,
read_contract_summary.
In CI
The Action measures a preview deployment against the contract committed in the repository and keeps a single pull request comment up to date instead of adding one per push.
- uses: jamalkamaladdin/pixelpact/action@v0
with:
contract: contract.json
url: ${{ steps.preview.outputs.url }}
viewport: desktop
tolerance: 1It needs permissions: pull-requests: write and no secret beyond the automatic
GITHUB_TOKEN. Every input, every output and a complete workflow are in
action/README.md.
How it works
Playwright opens the reference at each requested viewport, waits for fonts, network and paint to settle, and dismisses cookie overlays.
A single function is evaluated inside the page. It walks the DOM under your root selector and records the computed style of every visible element, plus custom properties, keyframes, and the geometry of each box.
Interactive elements are hovered and focused, and only the properties that actually change are stored, so a contract stays small enough to read.
Checking repeats step 2 against your implementation, matches elements by
data-contractattribute, then by selector, then by tag and text, and compares property by property. Lengths use a pixel tolerance, colors use a perceptual distance, and animations are compared by name and timing rather than by string equality.
Repository layout
Package | Published as | What it is |
| Extraction, checking, reporting | |
| The | |
| MCP server for coding agents | |
used from GitHub | Action for pull request checks |
FAQ
How is this different from Percy or Chromatic? They compare your page against a snapshot you approved earlier, which assumes the page is already right. pixelpact compares it against the reference, which is what you actually have while you are still building. The two fit together: pixelpact to get the page correct, a regression tool to keep it that way.
Do I need a baseline? No. The reference is the baseline, and that is the entire point.
My markup does not match the reference structure. Will anything match? Element matching
tries the data-contract attribute first, then the selector, then the tag and its text. Put
data-contract="hero-cta" on your element and matching stops depending on how the reference
happened to nest its divs.
How does an agent use it? Install pixelpact-mcp, point the MCP client at it, extract the
contract once, then let the agent call check_implementation after every edit and read the
deviation table it gets back.
The page has content that changes on every load. Will a check ever pass? Mask it.
--mask ".carousel" keeps a region out of the pixel comparison, and --max-elements stops a
long page from producing a contract nobody can read.
Which browsers? Chromium through Playwright. Running a matrix across engines is out of scope on purpose: this tool measures agreement with a design, not differences between browsers.
Does a passing check mean the page is correct? It means every value in the contract matched
inside tolerance. Elements that exist in your page but not in the reference are not flagged,
because the contract only describes what the reference contains. Run diff as well when
nothing extra is allowed.
Status
Extraction from a live page and from Figma, checking, the pixel diff, the MCP server and the Action are built, and the numbers shown above come from a real run. Planned and not built yet, so nothing here describes them as available:
Section by section side by side rendering as a first class command
Figma variables and published styles as a token source, beyond the color styles read today
Contributing
Development setup, the commands, and the pull request flow are in CONTRIBUTING.md. Security reports go through SECURITY.md.
License
MIT © Jamal Kamaladdin
Tool Schema Changelog
Recent tool additions, removals, and schema changes observed during successful MCP inspections. Dates show when Glama detected each change.
No tool schema history has been recorded yet.
This server cannot be installed
Maintenance
Resources
Unclaimed servers have limited discoverability.
Looking for Admin?
If you are the server author, to access and configure the admin panel.
Related MCP Connectors
- miromiroOAuthapp.miromiro
Turn any live website into brand colors, fonts, design tokens, SVGs, Lottie and paste-ready code.
Score any URL against a real design contract — 42 checks, A-F grade, token + motion validation.
On-demand drift checks: declared CSS color, radius, spacing & type vs your own tokens or a pack
Browser-based QA for AI-built software. Test pages with real browsers via agents.
Related MCP Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI to capture, compare, and automatically patch frontend code against reference designs, achieving pixel-perfect fidelity without manual CSS tweaking.247MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI agents to see, analyze, and visually verify web page changes through pixel-perfect diffing, theme extraction, layout analysis, and interactive element detection.5MIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceLets AI agents visually inspect web elements, test CSS edits in real-time, and iterate until pixel-perfect, functioning like browser DevTools for debugging UI issues.1121MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceVerifies that AI-generated UI code matches Figma design specs by rendering components in a real browser, comparing computed CSS, and returning patch-ready fixes with scored parity reports.MIT
Latest Blog Posts
- Who's Calling? MCP Hosts Are an Identity Blind Spot (And the Spec Knows It)By Om-Shree-0709 on .mcpAgent IdentityOAuth 2.1
- Your AI Chatbot Just Exposed Your CEO's Salary to an InternBy Om-Shree-0709 on .Agent IdentityMCP SecurityOAuth Delegation
- Why MCP Servers Need Execution Sandboxing (And Why Your Current Stack Isn't Enough)By Om-Shree-0709 on .Agentic AiPrompt InjectionWebAssembly
MCP directory API
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/jamalkamaladdin/pixelpact'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server