A
licenseA
qualityF
maintenanceAn MCP server that provides code review functionality using OpenAI, Google, and Anthropic models, serving as a "second opinion" tool that works with any MCP client.
1
13 npm
34
MIT
MCP Sage
by jalehman
Related Servers
Alternatives to MCP Sage
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceA universal MCP server that provides AI-powered code review and analysis for any programming language using Google's Gemini CLI.61MIT
- FlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server that connects Gemini 2.5 Pro to Claude Code, enabling users to generate detailed implementation plans based on their codebase and receive feedback on code changes.514-
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceGemini-powered MCP server for automated code review, analysis, and documentation.1341 npmMIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server that gives your IDE or agent access to Google Gemini with autonomous codebase exploration, enabling deep code analysis, architectural reviews, and bug hunting.2010MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceAn MCP server that integrates Google Gemini CLI with Claude Code for AI-powered development assistance, enabling code review, bug analysis, feature planning, and code explanation without requiring an API key.8MIT
TDQS
A4/5.0
Scored across 3 tools
Disambiguation5/5
Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: sage-opinion provides opinions on matters, sage-plan generates implementation plans through debate, and sage-review offers code review with edit suggestions. There is no overlap in functionality, and the descriptions clearly differentiate their roles.
Naming Consistency5/5
All tool names follow a consistent 'sage-' prefix with a descriptive suffix (opinion, plan, review), using kebab-case throughout. This pattern is predictable and enhances readability, making it easy to identify the tool's function at a glance.
Tool Count4/5
With 3 tools, the count is appropriate for a server focused on AI-assisted development tasks, as it covers key areas like opinion generation, planning, and code review. It is slightly lean but reasonable, as each tool serves a distinct and valuable purpose without redundancy.
Completeness4/5
The tool set covers core AI-assisted development workflows: opinion generation, planning, and code review. Minor gaps exist, such as the lack of tools for executing plans or managing project states, but agents can work around these by combining tools or using external methods.
Maintenance
ActivityInactive
ResponsivenessNo issues