Skip to main content
Glama
Sign In
mcp-arxiv-research-server

mcp-arxiv-research-server

by jafarSalim
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Local

Who cites this paper

find_citations
Read-only

Retrieve citation counts, influential citations, yearly citing paper trends, and top citing papers by arXiv ID, DOI, or Semantic Scholar ID to assess research impact.

Instructions

Citation count, influential citations, citing papers per year and the top citing papers, from Semantic Scholar. Accepts an arXiv id, a DOI, or a Semantic Scholar id (CorpusId:123 also works).

Tool call template

Replace each placeholder with a value matching the input schema. Only required parameters are included; add optional parameters as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {
      "id": "<id>"
    },
    "name": "find_citations"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
idYes
topNo
sortNomost_cited

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. First observedv1.0.0

TDQS

B3.2/5.0
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true and openWorldHint=true, so safety and external-dependency behavior is covered. The description adds the upstream data source and, usefully, the shape of the returned data in the absence of an output schema. It says nothing about rate limits, behavior for an unknown/ambiguous id, or pagination of citing papers.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two sentences, front-loaded with the returned data before the identifier details. The first sentence is a dense comma list but every element names a distinct return field, so nothing is padding.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness3/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With no output schema and 0% parameter description coverage, the description does the minimum-plus: it discloses return fields and identifier formats. It leaves the agent without guidance on the two optional parameters or on limits/edge cases, which is a meaningful gap for a three-parameter tool.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, so the description carries real weight here and does explain the id parameter's accepted formats (arXiv id, DOI, Semantic Scholar id, CorpusId:123), which the schema does not. However, 'top' and 'sort' are never explained — 'top citing papers' only hints at the top parameter, and the most_cited/newest enum and the 1–50 bound are left to the schema alone.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description names a specific resource and enumerates what is returned: citation count, influential citations, citing papers per year, and top citing papers, sourced from Semantic Scholar. An agent can tell this apart from get_paper or search_arxiv without opening a schema. It stops short of explicitly contrasting with those siblings.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

There is no statement of when to choose this tool over get_paper (metadata) or search_arxiv (discovery); the only guidance is about which identifier formats are accepted. That is invocation help, not usage selection, so the agent must infer the routing itself.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Deploy Server

Other Tools