Skip to main content
Glama
mcp-arxiv-research-server

mcp-arxiv-research-server

by jafarSalim

Export BibTeX

export_bibtex
Read-only

Generates compile-safe BibTeX for up to 200 arXiv papers, including stable citation keys, escaped LaTeX characters, preserved math, and protected acronyms for direct use in .bib files.

Instructions

BibTeX for up to 200 arXiv papers, ready for a .bib file: stable keys like vaswani2017attention, LaTeX special characters escaped, math in titles kept, acronyms protected.

Tool call template

Replace each placeholder with a value matching the input schema. Only required parameters are included; add optional parameters as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {
      "ids": "<ids>"
    },
    "name": "export_bibtex"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
idsYes

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. First observedv1.0.0

TDQS

A3.8/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations only cover readOnly and openWorld, so the description's added detail is genuinely valuable: it discloses the 200-paper ceiling, the citation-key convention (vaswani2017attention), LaTeX escaping, retained math, and acronym protection. It stops short of error behavior (invalid or non-arXiv IDs) and whether results are ordered or how failures are reported.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

A single front-loaded sentence with no filler: format, scale limit, and the three output guarantees an agent needs to trust the result. Every clause carries information.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a one-parameter, non-mutating export with no output schema, the description covers output shape and formatting conventions well. The remaining gap is input ID format and any failure semantics for unknown or over-limit inputs.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

With one parameter and 0% schema description coverage, the description must compensate; it does so partially by labeling the input as arXiv papers, implying arXiv identifiers rather than arbitrary strings, and restating the 200 cap. It does not specify the accepted ID syntax (bare ID vs. URL vs. version suffix), which is the main thing the schema leaves undefined.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States precisely what is produced ('BibTeX for up to 200 arXiv papers, ready for a .bib file'), which distinguishes it from siblings like find_citations or get_paper by output format rather than by an explicit competitive framing. The core operation is unambiguous, though it never names an alternative tool.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Usage is only implied by the phrase 'ready for a .bib file' — an agent can infer this is the export path when the user wants a bibliography. There is no explicit when-to-use, no when-not-to-use, and no mention of siblings such as find_citations as the discovery step preceding export.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.