Bulk Update Themes

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The annotation only provides openWorldHint=true, so the description carries most of the transparency burden. It discloses that the tool mutates themes and is asynchronous by noting that it returns an operation_id. It could further explain how to track that operation, but the core behavioral characteristics are covered.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two short sentences with no filler. The action and scope come first, and the key return value is stated immediately after. Every sentence earns its place.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple two-parameter bulk update with no output schema, the description provides enough to invoke it correctly: what it does, its scope, and what it returns. It does not elaborate on how to use the operation_id for status tracking, but that is not strictly required to invoke the tool.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, with both env_id and themes already described in the input schema. The tool description adds no additional parameter-level meaning, so the baseline score of 3 applies.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description names a specific action ('Update multiple themes'), a specific resource ('themes'), and the scope ('to their latest versions at once'). It clearly distinguishes itself from the single-theme sibling kinsta_themes_update by emphasizing 'multiple' and 'bulk' behavior.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description clearly implies this tool is for updating more than one theme at once, which differentiates it from kinsta_themes_update. However, it does not explicitly state when to prefer the single-theme alternative, so it stops short of full exclusion guidance.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.