Skip to main content
Glama
j4th
by j4th

goldfish_metagame

Read-onlyIdempotent

Retrieve the current metagame breakdown for any competitive Magic: The Gathering format, showing top archetypes with meta share, deck counts, and paper prices.

Instructions

Get the current metagame breakdown for a competitive format.

Shows top archetypes with meta share percentages, deck counts, and estimated paper prices.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
formatYesMTG format name (e.g. 'Modern', 'Legacy', 'Pioneer', 'Pauper')
response_formatNoOutput verbosity: 'detailed' (default) or 'concise'detailed
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint, idempotentHint, and openWorldHint. The description adds context about the data returned (archetypes, percentages, prices) but does not go beyond what annotations cover for safety.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is two sentences, front-loaded with the primary purpose, and contains no unnecessary verbiage.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a read-only data retrieval tool, the description adequately explains the output contents. Missing details like result structure or pagination are not critical given simplicity.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Input schema covers both parameters with descriptions (100% coverage). The description does not add further meaning to parameters beyond the schema, so baseline score of 3 applies.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool retrieves a metagame breakdown for a competitive format, listing specific data points (archetypes, shares, counts, prices). It is distinct from siblings like metagame_snapshot but does not explicitly differentiate.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives (e.g., metagame_snapshot, goldfish_archetype_list). Context for appropriate use is missing.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/j4th/mtg-mcp-server'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server