Skip to main content
Glama

Delete Test Layer Schema

delete_test_layer_schema
DestructiveIdempotent

Remove a test layer schema from an Allure TestOps project by its ID. Requires explicit confirmation to proceed, preventing accidental deletion of layer definitions.

Instructions

Delete a test layer schema from the project. ⚠️ CAUTION: Destructive.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
confirmNoMust be set to True to proceed with deletion. Safety measure.
schema_idYesID of the test layer schema to delete.
project_idNoAllure TestOps project ID.
output_formatNoOutput format: 'json' (default) or 'plain'.

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
idNo
actionNoRequested operation name.
statusNo
schema_idNo
requires_confirmationNo
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Caution about destructiveness adds no value beyond the already present destructiveHint annotation. No disclosure of side effects (e.g., cascade delete, permissions) or required confirmation steps.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two sentences with clear purpose and warning. Front-loaded but could be slightly more informative without adding length.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness3/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a destructive tool, missing context about the confirm parameter (important for safety) and what happens after deletion. Output schema exists but not referenced.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so the baseline is 3. Description adds no extra meaning to parameters like confirm, project_id, or output_format.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Clear verb 'Delete' and resource 'test layer schema' directly state the action. Distinguishes from sibling tools that operate on different entities (test cases, test layers, etc.).

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternative actions like update or list. Lack of context on prerequisites or when deletion is appropriate.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/ivanostanin/lucius-mcp'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server