Skip to main content
Glama

Create Shared Step

create_shared_step

Create reusable shared steps for test cases, enabling consistent reuse of common actions and reducing duplication in test management workflows.

Instructions

Create a new reusable Shared Step.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
nameYesThe name of the shared step (e.g., "Login as Admin").
stepsNoOptional list of steps. Each step is a dictionary with: - action (str): The step description (e.g., "Enter username"). - expected (str, optional): The expected result. - attachments (list[dict], optional): List of attachments containing: - content (str): Base64 encoded content. - name (str): Filename. - steps (list[dict], optional): Nested steps (recursive structure).
project_idNoOptional override for the default Project ID.
output_formatNoOutput format: 'json' (default) or 'plain'.

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
idNo
urlNo
nameNo
project_idNo
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description adds no behavioral context beyond what annotations already provide (readOnlyHint=false indicates creation). It does not disclose side effects, permissions, or output format, which is important for a creation tool.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness3/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single sentence, but it is too terse for a tool with 4 parameters and a complex nested structure. Conciseness is achieved at the cost of completeness.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness2/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the presence of an output schema and complex parameters, the description fails to provide sufficient context about the tool's role in test management or how it relates to siblings like link_shared_step. An agent would lack essential selection cues.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema has 100% description coverage with detailed explanations for each parameter. The description adds no additional meaning, so baseline score of 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action ('Create') and resource ('reusable Shared Step'). It is specific but does not differentiate from siblings like update_shared_step or delete_shared_step beyond the verb.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives (e.g., searching or updating shared steps). The description provides no context for selection among siblings.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/ivanostanin/lucius-mcp'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server