A
licenseA
qualityD
maintenanceEnables querying multiple AI models in parallel (Claude, Gemini, O3) and synthesizing their responses using anonymous analysis to reduce bias, providing a comprehensive answer.
1
34 npm
193
MIT
Model Council MCP Server
Related Servers
Alternatives to Model Council MCP Server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
polydev-aiofficial
AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceQueries multiple AI models simultaneously (GPT 5.2, Claude Opus 4.5, Gemini 3, Grok 4.1) via a single API call to provide diverse expert perspectives and consensus recommendations.MIT- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceEnables Claude to chat with various AI models and obtain multi-model consensus for complex decisions.4735 npm2MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables calling multiple AI models in parallel and synthesizing their drafts into a single stronger answer through any OpenAI-compatible endpoint.MIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceMulti-AI Consensus Tool: Query multiple AI models in parallel, synthesize responses for better accuracy, and reduce AI bias through ensemble decision-making.133MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceConnects Claude Code with multiple AI models (Gemini, Grok-3, ChatGPT, DeepSeek) simultaneously, allowing users to get diverse AI perspectives, conduct AI debates, and leverage each model's unique strengths.152MIT
TDQS
B3.2/5.0
Scored across 4 tools
Disambiguation5/5
Each tool has a distinct purpose: guide provides overview, scan runs a single task, compare evaluates options, and red_team stress-tests plans. No overlap in functionality.
Naming Consistency4/5
Tools follow a pattern of prefix (council_ or tri_model_) plus action (guide as noun, scan/compare/red_team as verbs). Slight inconsistency because 'guide' is a noun while others are verbs, but overall clear and predictable.
Tool Count5/5
Four tools cover the core use cases for model comparison and evaluation without being excessive. The number is well-scoped for the server's purpose.
Completeness4/5
Covers guidance, raw outputs, comparison, and stress-testing. Minor gap: no tool for detailed individual model capabilities beyond the guide. Still adequately complete for the domain.
Maintenance
ActivityInactive
ResponsivenessNo issues