tailscale_key_get
Retrieve details of a specific Tailscale authentication key by providing its key ID.
Instructions
Get details of a specific auth key by its ID.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| keyId | Yes | Auth key ID |
Retrieve details of a specific Tailscale authentication key by providing its key ID.
Get details of a specific auth key by its ID.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| keyId | Yes | Auth key ID |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided, so description must fully disclose behavior. It only states 'get details' without specifying what details are returned, side effects, or whether the key must exist.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single concise sentence with no unnecessary words, fitting for a simple tool.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
No output schema, so description should explain return values. It does not. Lacks mention of read-only nature. Adequate for a simple tool but incomplete.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The single parameter 'keyId' has schema description 'Auth key ID' (100% coverage). The tool description adds no extra meaning, so baseline score of 3 is appropriate.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description uses a specific verb ('Get') and resource ('details of a specific auth key by its ID'), clearly distinguishing from sibling tools like tailscale_key_list or tailscale_key_delete.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives (e.g., tailscale_key_list to find key IDs first) or any prerequisites.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/itunified-io/mcp-tailscale'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server