mcp-tailscale
Related Servers
Alternatives to mcp-tailscale
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceMCP server and CLI for Tailscale that lets agents inspect and manage tailnet devices, routes, users, keys, DNS, and ACL policy over stdio or streamable HTTP.5AGPL 3.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityFmaintenanceAn MCP (Model Context Protocol) server for managing Tailscale resources using the official Tailscale Go client library v2. This server provides complete coverage of the Tailscale API with enhanced, self-descriptive tools powered by OpenAPI documentation.3MIT
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceMCP server for safe programmatic access to the local Tailscale daemon: tailnet discovery, SSH config generation, port sharing via Serve/Funnel, and latency matrices.64 npm1Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial No Derivatives 4.0 International
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceAn MCP server for managing and monitoring Tailscale networks through natural language. It enables users to list devices, check connection status, monitor for client updates, and retrieve detailed tailnet summaries.65 npm7MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceWraps the Tailscale CLI to enable MCP-capable AI agents to manage devices, serve configurations, and diagnose connectivity.3MIT
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceProduction-ready TypeScript MCP server exposing utility, GitHub, and Microsoft Teams tools over stdio.141MIT
TDQS
Scored across 49 tools
Most tools have clearly distinct resource+action pairs, and the names make selection straightforward. Minor overlap exists between tailscale_dns_nameservers_get and tailscale_dns_preferences_get (both surface MagicDNS status) and between tailscale_acl_validate and tailscale_acl_test.
The dominant pattern is tailscale_<resource>_<action>, which is applied consistently across most tools. A few outliers break the pattern: tailscale_derp_map and tailscale_status lack an action verb, and tailscale_api_verify places the verb at the end.
At 49 tools, this is well beyond the 25+ threshold and makes tool selection a heavy burden for agents. The count reflects the broad Tailscale admin API surface rather than redundant duplicates, but the sheer volume still hurts usability.
The surface covers nearly all major Tailscale admin resources: devices, DNS, ACL, auth keys, webhooks, users, posture integrations, tailnet settings, log streaming, and DERP maps. Minor gaps exist (no webhook update, no general-purpose device update), but core workflows are fully supported.