Skip to main content
Glama
its-qusai-nasr

Jira Admin MCP Server

jira_projects_update_role

Add or remove a user or group from a Jira project role. Provide project key, role ID, action, and actor details to update role membership.

Instructions

Add or remove an actor (user or group) from a project role.

Use jira_projects_get_roles first to find the role_id. Returns: {success, project_key, role_id, action, actor_value}

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
project_keyYesProject key
role_idYesRole ID from jira_projects_get_roles
actionYes'add' or 'remove'
actor_typeYes'user' or 'group'
actor_valueYesAccount ID for users, group name for groups

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No arguments

Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already indicate readOnlyHint=false, and the description's 'add or remove' confirms mutation. The description adds the return format but no further behavioral details like permissions or reversibility.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two sentences with a clear action, prerequisite, and return format. Every sentence adds value with no redundancy.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The description is mostly complete given full schema, output schema, and annotations. It mentions a prerequisite tool and return shape. Missing potential context like permissions but acceptable.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so the description does not need to add parameter detail. The return format is mentioned but does not enhance parameter understanding.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states it adds or removes an actor from a project role, using specific verbs and resource. It distinguishes itself from sibling tools like jira_projects_get_roles by mentioning it as a prerequisite.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicitly advises to use jira_projects_get_roles first to find role_id, providing a clear prerequisite. However, it does not provide when-not-to-use or alternative tools for similar operations.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/its-qusai-nasr/jira-admin-mcp'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server