Skip to main content
Glama
isomoes

All-in-MCP

by isomoes
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Remote

Related Servers

Alternatives to All-in-MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • research-mcp

      404Simon
      F
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A read-only FastMCP server for academic research that lets agents search papers, inspect metadata, follow citation graphs, generate BibTeX, and read full texts of open-access PDFs via semantic scholar, OpenAlex, arXiv, DBLP, and Crossref.
      6
      -

    • Security Paper Search MCP

      songyaeji
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      Not graded
      maintenance
      Enables searching and retrieving security conference papers from major venues (S&P, USENIX, CCS, NDSS, etc.) using natural language queries through the MCP protocol.
      10 npm
      MIT

    • Semantic Scholar MCP Server

      Weber61365
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables users to search academic literature, explore citation and reference networks, retrieve detailed paper and author metadata, and generate paper recommendations through a FastMCP interface.
      -

    • Semantic Scholar MCP Server

      scottorlov268
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables users to search academic papers, explore citation and reference networks, retrieve author profiles and publications, and generate paper recommendations through a structured MCP interface.
      -
    Deploy Server
    Shareable, User-Owned Context BackendPeople, applications, and agents read, write, and coordinate together in one context lake. Reach it over MCP, a CLI, a Python SDK, or REST.fulcradynamics.comAd

    TDQS

    C2/5.0

    Scored across 7 tools

    Disambiguation2/5

    The tools are split into two distinct domains (academic papers and GitHub), but within the GitHub group, three tools lack descriptions and are ambiguously named (e.g., getRepoAllDirectories vs getRepoDirectories). The apaper tools are well-described and distinct.

    Naming Consistency2/5

    Tool names follow two different conventions: snake_case with 'apaper_' prefix for academic tools, and camelCase with 'github-repo-mcp_' prefix for GitHub tools. This inconsistency makes it harder for an agent to predict naming patterns.

    Tool Count3/5

    The total of 7 tools is reasonable, but the server tries to cover two unrelated domains with only a few tools each. The academic part (~4 tools) is appropriately scoped, while the GitHub part (3 tools) feels marginal for a repository toolset.

    Completeness2/5

    The academic paper tools cover search and download, which is decent. However, the GitHub tools only provide read operations (get directories and file) with no support for listing repositories, searching code, or any write actions, leaving significant gaps for typical repository interactions.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources