cst_array_grating_lobe_analysis

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided. Description states it 'analyzes' and 'returns' results, implying a read-only operation without side effects. However, it does not explicitly confirm non-destructive behavior or disclose any computational constraints.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two sentences, efficiently communicating the tool's function, inputs, and outputs without any extraneous information. Front-loaded with the core purpose.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a tool with two parameters and no output schema, the description provides sufficient context to understand the basic operation. However, it lacks details on the return format or assumptions, and could be more complete given no annotations.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema covers both parameters with descriptions (100% coverage). The tool description adds no extra meaning beyond the schema, so baseline score of 3 applies.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description clearly identifies the tool's purpose: analyzing grating lobes given element spacing and scan angle. It distinguishes from sibling tools by specifying a unique function not covered by other array tools like beam steering or array factor calculation.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No explicit guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. The description implies use for grating lobe analysis but lacks prerequisites, alternatives, or context where it should not be used.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.